after creating the perfect fern, now you give us the archetype of frog :-)
maybe the answer articulates a tension at the core of our western culture: (only) the surface is always real (postmodern), the surface is never real (high modernism)...
such a deep and funny post, i am delighted :-) (i have always loved the subtlety of your sense of humour)
The clear form, the endless mystic, the hidden witness -- masterfully done
ReplyDeleteWilliam: as nietzsche said (i think this is what he said): if you stare at a frog for long enough, the frog will stare back at you ...
Deleteafter creating the perfect fern, now you give us the archetype of frog :-)
ReplyDeletemaybe the answer articulates a tension at the core of our western culture: (only) the surface is always real (postmodern), the surface is never real (high modernism)...
such a deep and funny post, i am delighted :-)
(i have always loved the subtlety of your sense of humour)
Roxana: :-)
Deletenoumenon or phenomenon? surface or what is under the surface? i'm not sure that either is real, perhaps only the action of questioning ...
i envy frogs, who never bruise themselves on such quandaries (as far as i know :-)))
Hehehe, fun post (and cool title too) James!
ReplyDeleteHave a good weekend! ;-)
Lucia: thank you ... a great weekend to you, too!!
Delete:)Never though a frog could look so cute!
ReplyDeleteMarion: i'm pretty sure he is a prince :-)
Delete